# Forum & Clause — full text

> Forum & Clause is an independent publication about cross-border commercial agreements and dispute processes. It helps business readers identify the choices, documents, and professional questions that matter when more than one legal system may be involved.

# Commercial Arbitration Process: A Plain Guide

> Commercial arbitration usually proceeds from an arbitration agreement and notice of dispute to tribunal appointment, a procedural timetable, written cases and evidence, any hearing, and a final award. Challenge and enforcement may follow in different courts. The contract, chosen rules, law of the arbitral seat, and enforcement jurisdictions control the actual route, so parties in a live dispute should obtain qualified counsel promptly.

Source: https://icsid.org/commercial-arbitration-process/  
Publisher: Forum & Clause  
Published: 2026-07-19  
Updated: 2026-09-07

## How does the commercial arbitration process work?

Commercial arbitration usually moves from an arbitration agreement and notice of dispute to tribunal appointment, a procedural timetable, written cases and evidence, any hearing, and a final award. The exact route depends on the contract, chosen rules, law of the arbitral seat, tribunal directions, and courts with supporting or enforcement roles. Parties facing an actual dispute should obtain qualified counsel promptly because deadlines and rights vary.

## The contract creates the starting point

Arbitration is based on an agreement to submit covered disputes to arbitration. The clause or later agreement may identify institutional rules or an ad hoc process, the seat, language, number of arbitrators, appointment method, and dispute scope.

The seat connects the proceeding to a national arbitration law and its courts. A hearing can occur elsewhere without necessarily changing the legal seat. Counsel should examine the exact clause, amendments, and any competing court provision before filing.

The [UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration) is a model designed to help States modernize arbitral-procedure laws. It covers stages from the arbitration agreement and tribunal composition through court intervention, recognition, and enforcement. It is not itself the governing statute everywhere; counsel must check the law actually adopted at the seat.

## A notice or request begins the case

The claimant normally delivers the notice or request required by the agreement and rules, identifying the parties, arbitration agreement, dispute, requested relief, and any appointment proposal. The respondent can answer under the controlling timetable.

Service method, filing destination, fees, and deadlines are rule-specific. A general article cannot determine whether an email, courier package, portal filing, or contractual-notice route is sufficient in a live case.

## The tribunal is constituted

The parties, an administering body, or an appointing authority selects the tribunal under the agreed method and applicable law. Those sources also govern disclosures, challenges, and replacement.

Once constituted, the tribunal addresses its jurisdiction and organizes the case. A jurisdiction objection may concern whether a valid arbitration agreement exists, who is bound, or whether a claim falls within its scope. The timing and decision route for such objections differ, so counsel should not assume they can be saved for later.

## Procedure is designed for the particular dispute

The [UNCITRAL Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/explanatorytexts/organizing_arbitral_proceedings) provide an annotated list of matters a tribunal may decide, including rules, language, place, confidentiality, hearings, evidence, and requirements for delivering an award. The Notes can be used in institutional and ad hoc arbitration.

A procedural order or timetable may address written submissions, document production, witnesses, experts, confidentiality, hearing format, interim applications, and communications. The tribunal's directions and governing rules control; this is not a universal list of mandatory steps.

## The parties present documents, witnesses, and argument

Each side develops its case through permitted submissions and evidence. Depending on the rules, the tribunal may hold a hearing, decide issues on documents, or combine the two. Arbitration evidence rules need not mirror court rules.

Preserve potentially relevant records when a dispute is reasonably anticipated and obtain counsel's instructions on lawful collection, privacy, privilege, confidentiality, and litigation-hold duties. Do not delete, alter, backdate, coach, or manufacture evidence.

## The tribunal issues an award

After the record closes, the tribunal issues its decision in the required form. An award may address jurisdiction, liability, remedies, interest, and costs. Correction, interpretation, or supplementation procedures are framework-specific.

Arbitration does not guarantee privacy, speed, lower cost, or a particular result. Confidentiality depends on the agreement, rules, orders, and applicable law. Court proceedings connected with arbitration or enforcement may also affect what becomes public.

## Challenge and enforcement are separate questions

An award may face a challenge at the seat and may need recognition or enforcement where assets are located. These are not ordinary appeals on every alleged error. Available grounds and deadlines come from the relevant law and treaty framework.

The [New York Convention](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards) provides common legislative standards for recognition of arbitration agreements and court recognition and enforcement of foreign and non-domestic arbitral awards. Application still depends on the States involved, their treaty status and reservations, local procedure, and the facts. Counsel in the enforcement jurisdiction should assess that route.

## Questions to settle with counsel early

Bring the complete contract and amendments, the dispute timeline, notices, key records, counterparties' legal names, known asset locations, and urgent commercial constraints. Ask counsel to confirm:

- the clause, covered parties, claims, rules, seat, and language;
- notice, filing, limitation, and preservation deadlines;
- interim relief and available court support;
- tribunal appointment and challenge procedure;
- confidentiality, privilege, data, and evidence obligations;
- expected stages, decision points, fees, and cost exposure; and
- likely challenge, recognition, and enforcement jurisdictions.

For agreement planning before a dispute exists, use the [cross-border contract checklist](/cross-border-contract-checklist/) and the [Cross-Border Contracts](/cross-border-contracts/) section.

## Sources

- [UNCITRAL, Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/modellaw/commercial_arbitration) — 1985, amended 2006, accessed September 3, 2026; supports the Model Law's state-legislation purpose and its coverage of the arbitral process.
- [UNCITRAL, Notes on Organizing Arbitral Proceedings](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/explanatorytexts/organizing_arbitral_proceedings) — updated in 2016 and 2023, accessed September 3, 2026; supports the stated list of procedural matters and its use in institutional and ad hoc arbitration.
- [UNCITRAL, New York Convention overview](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/arbitration/conventions/foreign_arbitral_awards) — accessed September 3, 2026; supports the Convention's recognition-and-enforcement aims and scope.

## Frequently asked questions

**What starts a commercial arbitration?**

A claimant generally sends and files the notice or request required by the arbitration agreement and applicable rules. Required contents, service method, recipient, filing fee, and commencement date vary. Counsel should review the complete clause and rules before filing because a generic email or ordinary contractual notice may not satisfy the controlling process.

**Is the seat of arbitration the same as the hearing location?**

Not necessarily. The seat is the arbitration's legal location and connects the proceeding to an arbitration law and supporting courts. A hearing may take place elsewhere or online without changing that seat, depending on the controlling framework. Qualified counsel should confirm both the legal seat and practical hearing arrangements.

**Is commercial arbitration always confidential?**

No universal rule makes every commercial arbitration confidential. Privacy and confidentiality can depend on the agreement, chosen rules, tribunal orders, applicable law, and related court proceedings. Parties should ask counsel what duties bind participants, what disclosures are permitted or required, and whether recognition or enforcement proceedings may create a public record.

**Can a commercial arbitration award be appealed?**

Arbitral awards may be subject to limited correction, interpretation, challenge, or refusal-of-enforcement procedures, but these are not identical to an ordinary court appeal. Grounds, forum, and deadlines depend on the seat, rules, treaty framework, and enforcement jurisdiction. A party considering any challenge should obtain qualified counsel immediately.


---

# Commercial Mediation vs Arbitration: Compare Outcomes

> Commercial mediation helps parties negotiate a settlement; the mediator does not impose the outcome. Commercial arbitration submits a dispute to arbitrators for a binding decision, called an award. A negotiated settlement and an award require different legal review, including cross-border enforcement. This is general process education, not legal advice. Qualified counsel should examine the complete agreement, relevant jurisdictions, applicable rules, and any urgent deadlines before a party acts.

Source: https://icsid.org/commercial-mediation-vs-arbitration/  
Publisher: Forum & Clause  
Published: 2026-09-08  
Updated: 2026-09-08

## How do commercial mediation and arbitration differ?

Commercial mediation helps parties negotiate a settlement; the mediator does not impose the outcome. Commercial arbitration submits a dispute to arbitrators for a binding decision, called an award. A negotiated settlement and an award require different legal review, including cross-border enforcement. This is general process education, not legal advice. Qualified counsel should examine the complete agreement, relevant jurisdictions, applicable rules, and any urgent deadlines before a party acts.

The distinction is about decision-making authority, not whether everyone attends the same meeting. [WIPO's overview of dispute-resolution procedures](https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/wipo-adr.html) separates assistance with agreement from adjudication of rights and obligations. The examples below are original teaching exercises, not clauses or legal forms.

## What does each process produce?

| Comparison | Commercial mediation | Commercial arbitration |
|---|---|---|
| Neutral's role | Help the parties reach agreement | Decide submitted disputes within the tribunal's authority |
| Control over the outcome | Parties decide whether to accept settlement terms | Tribunal determines the decision on the submitted issues |
| Main outcome to examine | Settlement agreement, if agreement is reached | Arbitral award, if the case reaches a decision |
| Document-review question | What obligations did the parties actually agree? | What did the tribunal actually decide? |
| Cross-border follow-up | Which law or treaty route applies to this settlement? | Which recognition or enforcement route applies to this award? |

These are conceptual contrasts, not a promise that either procedure will be available or suitable for a particular dispute. The [cross-border contract checklist](/cross-border-contract-checklist/) helps assemble the underlying agreement for review. The [commercial arbitration process guide](/commercial-arbitration-process/) addresses the procedural sequence; this comparison focuses on authority and resulting documents.

Do not treat “non-binding mediation” as meaning that a resulting settlement is optional. [WIPO's mediation explanation](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/mediation/what-mediation) distinguishes the mediator's inability to impose an outcome from the parties' settlement recorded in a contract. Whether a particular document creates enforceable obligations still requires legal analysis.

## How would the same fictional disagreement look in each process?

Imagine a supplier and a customer in different countries disputing payment for a software-delivery project. The supplier says it delivered the agreed package. The customer says a required report is missing. Both want clarity about support for the next project phase.

The fictional file contains a signed agreement, a technical schedule, a delivery email, an invoice, and a later discussion about additional support. No country, governing law, procedural rules, or claim value is assigned. That omission is deliberate: the exercise cannot establish liability, a legal remedy, or a recommended forum.

For a mediation discussion, the teams might identify possible negotiated subjects: the disputed invoice, delivery of the report, and future support. These are proposed discussion topics, not concessions that anyone must make. The mediator can help explore them; the exercise does not turn them into agreed obligations.

For an arbitration discussion with counsel, the focus would include which claims are covered by the arbitration agreement, what each side alleges, which records support those allegations, and what relief falls within the tribunal's authority. A business preference for additional future support should not be listed as though an arbitrator necessarily has power to order it.

The useful contrast is not “friendly meeting versus hostile hearing.” It is “terms the parties might negotiate versus questions a decision-maker is authorized to determine.” Either conversation needs a reliable factual record and legal review.

## Can you separate the documents by function?

Here is an original reading exercise using the same fictional file. The labels describe the assumed function in this exercise; they do not determine the legal effect of an actual document with a similar filename.

| Fictional document | Function in the exercise | Question for counsel |
|---|---|---|
| Agreement and technical schedule | Describe the original project and dispute provisions | Which version controls, and what process does it require? |
| Discussion note | Lists possible report-delivery and support options | Is anything here an offer, admission, or commitment? |
| Draft settlement | Proposes a negotiated resolution | What remains unresolved, and who can approve the terms? |
| Signed settlement | Records the parties' stated resolution | Which obligations and releases are effective, and how are they enforced? |
| Award | Records an assumed tribunal decision | Which claims, parties, relief, and costs does it address? |

Suppose the discussion note says “support to be discussed,” while a draft settlement says “support scope pending approval.” An internal summary should not convert either phrase into “supplier agreed to provide support.” The practical task is faithful description, not deciding whether a binding agreement exists from a few words.

Likewise, suppose the assumed award addresses the invoice but the fictional summary says nothing about future support. Write “review award scope with counsel,” not “all business issues resolved.” Absence from a summary is not proof of what the complete decision contains.

A useful index has separate columns for document date, author or signatory, version, stated status, and unresolved question. Keep the originals intact. Ask counsel how to handle privileged, confidential, personal, or restricted material before sharing it across teams or borders. Do not edit source records to make them agree with a preferred account.

## Does agreeing to mediation also authorize arbitration?

Not automatically. [WIPO's arbitration explanation](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/arbitration/what-is-arb) describes arbitration as based on party agreement, including a contract clause or a later submission agreement. An invitation to discuss settlement does not, by itself, establish the scope of an arbitration agreement.

Read the exact dispute provision and any later process agreement with counsel. In our fictional index, “mediation proposal” and “arbitration clause” are separate entries. That separation prevents a planning note from being mistaken for the document that supplies adjudicative authority.

A staged clause can raise additional questions: what triggers each stage, which disputes it covers, whether a required preliminary step has occurred, and what happens if discussions end without settlement. These are review questions, not an instruction to send a notice or start proceedings.

Do not assume negotiations suspend time limits. Even Article 28 of the [WIPO Mediation Rules, effective July 1, 2021](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/mediation/rules/index), qualifies its limitation-period suspension provision by what applicable law permits. Obtain prompt advice about deadlines and urgent protective measures; this article supplies no deadline calculation.

## Is mediation automatically confidential?

Do not infer a universal protection from the procedure's name. Under the WIPO Mediation Rules specifically, Article 15 prohibits recording meetings; Article 16 addresses confidentiality undertakings; Article 18 restricts specified material's use as evidence, with qualifications including settlement-enforcement and legal-requirement exceptions for settlement agreements. These are rules-specific provisions, not a worldwide evidence code. [WIPO Mediation Rules](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/mediation/rules/index)

Before circulating the fictional discussion note, the document index should ask: who may receive it, for what purpose, under which rules or agreement, and with what legal restrictions? Put that question to counsel rather than adding a “confidential” label and assuming the label answers it.

For any real process, counsel should reconcile confidentiality, evidence preservation, disclosure, and record-handling obligations. Do not destroy records or make recordings based on a general comparison article. The same caution applies to material sent through a shared workspace or an automated transcription service.

## Are settlements and awards enforced through the same route?

They are not interchangeable documents. The [UNCITRAL overview of the Singapore Convention on Mediation](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements/) describes a framework for international written settlements resulting from mediation that resolve commercial disputes. Its scope has exclusions, including consumer, family, inheritance, and employment matters, and settlements enforceable as judgments or arbitral awards.

The overview also identifies formalities, grounds for refusing relief, reservations, and entry-into-force limits. It does not establish that a particular settlement qualifies or that a particular jurisdiction must enforce it.

For awards, the [New York Convention text](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/arbitration/ny-convention/text) addresses foreign and non-domestic arbitral awards. Article III links enforcement to local procedural rules and Convention conditions; Article V provides refusal grounds. Calling a document an award does not remove those questions.

Ask counsel in the relevant jurisdiction to identify the appropriate route for the actual document, applicable treaty status and reservations, formal requirements, available objections, and practical asset issues. This comparison neither recommends an enforcement filing nor guarantees recovery.

## What should a useful comparison sheet leave unresolved?

For the fictional project, a responsible summary might read:

“Possible settlement topics include the invoice, report, and support. No proposed term is treated as accepted. Counsel must confirm the governing process, authority to settle, deadlines, confidentiality, and any enforcement route. Any tribunal decision must be read for its actual scope.”

That summary is more useful than a box marked “mediation is better” or “arbitration is final.” It distinguishes known facts, possible negotiated subjects, and legal questions.

Use the [Dispute Processes section](/dispute-processes/) for further terminology. For a live matter, take the complete documents to qualified counsel. A clear comparison should help that discussion, not replace it.

## Sources

- [WIPO: ADR procedures](https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/center/wipo-adr.html) — mediator and arbitrator functions.
- [WIPO: what mediation is](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/mediation/what-mediation) — party control and negotiated settlement.
- [WIPO: what arbitration is](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/arbitration/what-is-arb) — agreement-based adjudication.
- [WIPO Mediation Rules](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/mediation/rules/index) — 2021 rules, Articles 15, 16, 18, and 28.
- [UNCITRAL: Singapore Convention overview](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/mediation/conventions/international_settlement_agreements/) — settlement framework and limitations.
- [New York Convention text, hosted by WIPO](https://www.wipo.int/en/web/amc/arbitration/ny-convention/text) — Articles I, III, and V.

## Frequently asked questions

**Can a commercial mediator decide who wins?**

A mediator assists negotiation rather than imposing the resolution. Parties may discuss possible terms, but a discussion topic is not automatically an accepted obligation. For an actual matter, counsel should review what was proposed, agreed, and recorded, as well as the applicable process and legal effect of the resulting documents.

**Does non-binding mediation mean a settlement can be ignored?**

No. The mediator's inability to impose an outcome is separate from the legal effect of a settlement the parties make. Do not treat the word non-binding as permission to disregard signed terms. Qualified counsel should assess the complete settlement, authority, governing law, and relevant jurisdictions before advising on obligations or enforcement.

**Can mediation and arbitration be used in the same dispute?**

A dispute process may combine settlement discussions with agreed arbitration, but the controlling documents and law matter. Do not infer authority to arbitrate from a mediation invitation or assume negotiations pause deadlines. Ask counsel to identify any staged clause, its requirements, the arbitration agreement, and urgent steps before acting.

**Is every mediation document protected from later disclosure?**

No universal rule follows from calling something a mediation document. Applicable law, agreements, and procedural rules require review. WIPO's rules contain specific confidentiality and evidentiary provisions with qualifications. Before sharing, recording, retaining, or disposing of material, ask counsel to reconcile the relevant confidentiality, disclosure, and preservation obligations.

**Does an international settlement automatically qualify for treaty enforcement?**

No. The Singapore Convention framework has scope requirements, exclusions, formalities, reservations, and grounds for refusing relief. An international setting alone does not answer those questions. Counsel should review the actual settlement and relevant jurisdiction; an arbitral award is a different document and may involve a different recognition or enforcement framework.


---

# Cross-Border Contract Checklist Before You Sign

> A cross-border contract checklist should cover the parties and signing authority, exact performance, price and currency, delivery and acceptance, change controls, notices, governing law, and dispute forum. It should also flag tax, data, intellectual-property, regulatory, sanctions, and enforcement issues for qualified counsel. The correct wording and legal effect depend on the full agreement and the relevant jurisdictions.

Source: https://icsid.org/cross-border-contract-checklist/  
Publisher: Forum & Clause  
Published: 2026-07-19  
Updated: 2026-09-07

## What should a cross-border contract checklist cover?

A cross-border contract checklist should identify the parties, promised performance, price and currency, delivery and acceptance rules, change controls, notices, governing law, and dispute forum. It should also flag tax, regulatory, data, intellectual-property, sanctions, and enforcement questions for qualified counsel. The checklist prepares a review; it does not determine which law applies or supply a safe clause for every jurisdiction.

## Confirm the parties and their authority

Record each party's exact legal name, registration details, business address, and role. Identify who will sign and what evidence establishes that person's authority. If a parent, affiliate, distributor, or guarantor is expected to perform or pay, make that role explicit rather than relying on a familiar trading name.

Counsel should check the relevant registries, capacity rules, required approvals, and any execution formalities. A correct name on the first page is useful only if the intended legal person is actually bound.

## Define the deal in observable terms

Describe the goods, services, milestones, quantities, specifications, and dependencies precisely enough that someone outside the negotiating team can tell whether performance occurred. State which proposal, schedule, drawing, or technical document controls if attachments conflict.

For goods, identify delivery responsibilities, inspection, acceptance, risk transfer, title, packaging, and the consequences of delay or nonconformity. For services, define deliverables, review windows, customer inputs, personnel dependencies, and completion evidence. Avoid assuming a commercial label has the same legal effect everywhere.

## Make the money terms complete

State the currency, amount or calculation method, invoice trigger, payment deadline, payment channel, and responsibility for bank charges. Address taxes, withholding, exchange controls, late-payment consequences, and disputed invoices with local tax and legal advisers.

The useful question is not merely “What is the price?” It is “What must happen before payment is due, in which currency, to which verified account, and what record proves payment?” Any account-change request should be verified through an independently known contact route.

## Choose the governing framework deliberately

The [HCCH Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts](https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=135) describe party freedom to choose the law governing an international commercial contract, subject to the Principles' scope and limits. That does not mean every choice works identically in every court or overrides mandatory rules.

Ask qualified counsel to distinguish governing law from the place of performance, tax residence, the location of assets, and the forum for disputes. They are different questions. In an international sale of goods, counsel should also check whether the [United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg) applies, has been excluded, or interacts with the chosen law.

## Design the dispute clause as a working instruction

Decide whether disputes go to court, arbitration, or a staged process such as negotiation followed by one of those routes. A usable provision addresses the forum or administering rules, place or seat, language, number or selection of decision-makers, notice method, and any required negotiation step.

Do not combine copied fragments from different templates. Inconsistent references can create a dispute about how to resolve the dispute. The companion guide to the [commercial arbitration process](/commercial-arbitration-process/) explains the usual procedural sequence, while the [Dispute Processes](/dispute-processes/) section covers the surrounding concepts.

## Check operational clauses before legal review

Prepare a single list covering:

- contract language and which version prevails;
- named contacts and valid notice addresses;
- confidentiality, data access, security, and record retention;
- ownership and permitted use of intellectual property;
- warranties, indemnities, exclusions, and liability limits;
- change orders, subcontracting, assignment, and control changes;
- force majeure, hardship, suspension, termination, and transition duties;
- export, import, sanctions, licensing, and sector-specific approvals; and
- insurance, audit evidence, records, and post-termination obligations.

These headings are prompts, not universal required clauses. Their relevance and legal effect depend on the transaction and jurisdictions.

## Run a contradiction and enforcement check

Compare the main agreement, schedules, purchase orders, online terms, and translations. Resolve duplicate definitions, mismatched dates, inconsistent payment triggers, and competing dispute provisions before signature.

Then ask where the other party's assets are and whether a judgment or arbitral award could realistically be recognized and enforced there. That question belongs with counsel in the relevant jurisdictions. A favorable clause has limited practical value if the chosen remedy cannot be pursued where it matters.

## Sources

- [HCCH, Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts](https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/full-text/?cid=135) — approved March 19, 2015 and accessed September 3, 2026; supports the stated scope and party-choice framework for governing law.
- [UNCITRAL, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods](https://uncitral.un.org/en/texts/salegoods/conventions/sale_of_goods/cisg) — accessed September 3, 2026; supports the Convention's international-sale-of-goods purpose and the need to check its application rather than assume domestic contract rules alone govern.

## Frequently asked questions

**What is the most important clause in an international contract?**

There is no universal most-important clause. Payment, performance, governing law, dispute forum, liability, and termination interact. A clause that looks strong in isolation may conflict with a schedule or prove difficult to enforce. Qualified counsel should review the complete agreement, transaction, counterparties, asset locations, and relevant jurisdictions together.

**Are governing law and jurisdiction the same thing?**

No. Governing law identifies the law used to decide contractual questions, while a jurisdiction or forum provision concerns where or how a dispute will be heard. Other rules may still be mandatory. Their validity and interaction depend on the agreement and jurisdictions, so local and cross-border counsel should review both choices.

**Does the CISG apply to every international sale?**

No. The CISG is a treaty framework for certain international sales of goods, but application depends on matters including the parties' places of business, the relevant Contracting States, the transaction, and the agreement. It also contains exclusions. Counsel should determine whether it applies, was validly excluded, or interacts with other law.

**Can I use an online cross-border contract template?**

A template can help identify topics, but it cannot establish that its clauses are valid, consistent, or suitable for a specific deal. Cross-border contracts may engage mandatory rules, treaty regimes, tax questions, and enforcement problems that the template never considered. Use it as a discussion draft and obtain qualified jurisdiction-specific legal review before signing.


---